Are We Witnessing The Downfall Of Scientific Authoritarianism?

Science and psychology have been shamelessly used by elites to turn women into wannabe men, and to turn the whole of society into compulsive shoppers and eaters

It seems social engineers have studied human beings well, as a power mad elite attempt to mold us into androgynous pods (one of the latest pushes is the mass marketing of makeup for men) who benefit their bottom line rather than free and independent men and women who live in pursuit of their own happiness. In the past century, they’ve learned how to sell us things we don’t need by manipulating our base emotions. They’ve learned how to brainwash millions of women into believing motherhood is oppressive and that being like men is what all women should aspire to.

They’ve taken lessons from psychologists, anthropologists and scientists about the structure of human societies and used them to aggrandize power rather than to serve the interests of the public. The knowledge gleaned from science is being used not to advance the human condition, but to control the masses in a way that benefits the upper crust of society rather than the individual.

This is an introduction to four of the most important thinkers of the past century. As we examine their ideas, we will see how each of these men’s ideas have been subverted by a small minority to manipulate and control the masses of humanity.

There is reason to believe the scientific knowledge elucidated below has been systematically used against men and society in general by a clandestine Deep State, i.e. “men behind the curtain” of Western governments.

Cigarettes are symbolic phalluses according to the Penis Envy theory, which was used by Freud’s nephew to design the first successful smoking campaign for women

Freud

Sigmund Freud’s ideas have been used to turn Americans into a mindless protoplasm that knows how to do nothing but consume for consumption’s sake.

Many people dismiss Freud’s theories without realizing they became the very foundation of the modern consumer economy when his nephew Edward Bernays decided to adapt them for use by corporations and the government in the then newly formed field of “public relations.” The term public relations is actually a creation of Bernays, who knew “propaganda ministry” wouldn’t sound so good even though that’s exactly what any public relations office is.

Penis Envy is one of the most controversial of Freud’s theories, even though it has been used quite successfully in numerous ad campaigns and social engineering schemes. In fact, the first successful cigarette campaign designed to get women smoking (smoking had always been taboo for women before) was based on the Penis Envy theory. Bernays designed a campaign in which cigarettes became “Torches of Freedom” as he encouraged women to symbolically and subconsciously sport their own penises by lighting up in a garish public display. The campaign was a huge success for Philip Morris, as cigarette sales for women skyrocketed after the “Torches of Freedom” campaign.

One need look no further than feminism to see Freud’s Penis Envy theory in action once again. At its core feminism is about turning women into wannabe men rather than encouraging them to fulfill their natural biological and psychological roles as mothers and wives. An ROK commenter recently offered this excellent assessment as to why women have gone insane as a result of the mass institution of Freud’s theory by feminism in Anglo America.

She believes childbearing to be oppressive but it isn’t. The ability to create life is a profound and admirable thing. What could woman ever do that could be more important than that? And of course they are miserable, because they aren’t fulfilling their purpose. They aren’t using their most important body part. They pretend they don’t even have a womb and take drugs to stop it from functioning. Like a cooped up horse that doesn’t use its legs, or a bird that can’t use its wings, or a bull or goat that can’t use its horns, women who don’t use their womb go insane. Women are meant to live in a perpetual cycle of sex-pregnancy-childbirth-suckling. It’s their natural life cycle if they don’t take birth control drugs to prevent it.

There is no surer sign Penis Envy is the basis of feminism than realizing the truth of that statement. Women have become ashamed of their life-creating capacity and think it’s nobler to slave away for an uncaring corporate boss rather than taking an active part in creating and nurturing the next generation of humans.

Freud’s scientific theories have been shamelessly used by elites to turn women into wannabe men, and corrupted by Bernays to help the corporate-government complex turn the whole of society into compulsive shoppers and eaters. This benefits the elite at the cost of everyone else in society.

It’s important to realize buying things for women will never fulfill them like keeping them barefoot and pregnant, to be uncouth about the issue.

In Sex and Culture, Unwin proved societies that unleash female instincts quickly become uncivilized

Unwin

In 1934, Oxford-educated anthropologist J.D. Unwin published Sex and Culture, a scientific study of 6 civilizations and 80 tribes covering a span of 5,000 years of human history. He warned of the consequences of completely abandoning restraints on female sexuality.

These societies lived in different geographical environments; they belonged to different racial stocks; but the history of their marriage customs is the same. In the beginning each society had the same ideas in regard to sexual regulations. Then the same struggles took place; the same sentiments were expressed; the same changes were made; the same results ensued. Each society reduced its sexual opportunity to a minimum and displaying great social energy, flourished greatly. Then it extended its sexual opportunity; its energy decreased, and faded away. The one outstanding feature of the whole story is its unrelieved monotony.

This dire warning came a full 30 years before the CIA funded Gloria Steinem and her Ms. Magazine. Any policymaker educated in anthropology would have known of Unwin’s groundbreaking revelation. This knowledge was ripe for the picking for those who wanted to break down Western society and redesign it as a New World Order collective in which the state was at the center of family. This of course means men have effectively become enemies of the state.

Aldous Huxley thought highly of Unwin’s ideas. He wrote:

Unwin’s conclusions, which are based upon an enormous wealth of carefully sifted evidence, may be summed up as follows. All human societies are in one or another of four cultural conditions: zoistic, manistic, deistic, rationalistic. Of these societies the zoistic displays the least amount of mental and social energy, the rationalistic the most. Investigation shows that the societies exhibiting the least amount of energy are those where pre-nuptial continence is not imposed and where the opportunities for sexual indulgence after marriage are greatest. The cultural condition of a society rises in exact proportion as it imposes pre-nuptial and post-nuptial restraints upon sexual opportunity.

In layman’s terms, Huxley warned us human society would regress rather than progress if women were allowed to become degenerate whores and their uncontrolled hypergamous instincts allowed the Pareto Principle to return – a world in which 20% of men dominate the sexuality of 80% of women. The rest of men go without until sex and companionship until they Go Galt and tear the system down.

Again, we see another apparent example of scientific knowledge being used by elites in designing an authoritarian playbook.

Robert Briffault proved men are nothing but utility objects to women

Briffault

Social anthropologist Robert Briffault’s erudite work entitled The Mothers, released 90 years ago also spelled out what would happen once male utility value was supplanted by the welfare state, a full 40 years before Johnson’s Great Society literally became the greatest act of cuckoldry in the history of mankind. Men have been cucked by the very government they are forced to pay taxes into ever since.

Social engineers would have to know the consequences of instituting such a system. From Briffault’s book The Mothers:

The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.

That simple statement illustrates why a welfare state weakens men’s hand in society. Of course, this is not surprising to those who know women see men as nothing but utility objects. (Then hypocritically chastise men who rightly see them as nothing but sex objects. Even though women literally have nothing else to offer men in the West in modern times.)

There are three important corollaries to Briffault’s Law:

Past benefit provided by the male does not provide for continued or future association.

Any agreement where the male provides a current benefit in return for a promise of future association is null and void as soon as the male has provided the benefit.

A promise of future benefit has limited influence on current/future association, with the influence inversely proportionate to the length of time until the benefit will be given and directly proportionate to the degree to which the female trusts the male.

In other words, anthropological science has revealed women are consummate users – even predators – of men. Of course, The Anglo-American Matrix used this knowledge to weaken the roles of men in society, replacing his provider role with the almighty state.

Tesla’s work on electricity changed the world. If we listened to him about women, his genius might change the world once again

Tesla

None other than engineering genius Nikola Tesla wrote about what was coming as a result of women trying to compete with and displace men from their roles in society. He wrote:

This struggle of the human female toward sex equality will end in a new sex order, with the female as superior.

However, while social engineers pushed women out of the home and the kitchen and into roles as corporate cogs and male wannabees, their innate psychological desires to submit to man, have children, and nurture have gone unfulfilled. The result is two generations of women who become increasingly shrill and miserable.

It seems to me that women are not particularly happy in this newly found freedom, in this new competition which they are waging so persistently against men in business and the professions and even in sport. The question that naturally arises is, whether the women themselves are the gainers or the losers.

What else was the feminist march on Washington a week after Trump’s inauguration but a bunch of malcontents, drunk on their own power pushing anti-family and anti-male bile without realizing the cognitive dissonance in the messages they preach. The very reason feminists are so unhappy is they never fulfilled their biological and evolutionary roles in society, and are destined to die with cats or other animals for children rather than human children who would love them and care for them in their old age.

So, feminism definitely makes women losers in society, to answer the question posed by Tesla.

Elites, including IMF manager Christine Lagarde met at Davos, Switzerland to discuss the crumbling facade they’ve constructed

Scientific Dictatorship Crumbling

It’s quite a coincidence that every Western policy instituted in the last century has gone against the prudent course the above knowledge would have dictated for leaders who care about their citizens. The good news is the use of the knowledge outlined above to control, deceive and brainwash millions might be coming to an end.

Thanks to the destruction of the centralized communication model that has dominated the world since the invention of radio and television, and the advent of free and open communication on the Internet, the elite-managed democracy we have been living under is now taking a populist turn. The elites are none too happy about the fact a mass awakening is revealing the control matrix they so carefully crafted, one that will be destroyed once a critical mass of awakened individuals has been reached. Perhaps then, this scientific knowledge can be used to help, rather than hinder humanity.

From their lofty perches at Davos, Switzerland, right after the crowning of Donald Trump the elite revealed just how unhappy they are with the turn away from their management of society. Even Establishment media couldn’t deny what was going on as Bloomberg reported: Davos Elite Seeks Fixes to Defend the System From Populists.

It helps to define populism, what the elite are “defending” against: populism is support for the concerns of ordinary people. The importance of that article can’t be overstated: A mainstream newspaper just came out and said the elite doesn’t give a damn about the concerns of ordinary people if one reads between the lines. That’s huge for the establishment to make that admission. In the report, hedge fund billionaire Ray Dalio even went so far as to say:

We may be at a point where globalization is ending, and provincialization and nationalization is taking hold.

They know the jig is up.

I hope for a peaceful resolution to the coming conflict between the elites and the rest of us, but elite interests are maniacal. There’s never enough money or power for them, while they foist Socialism on the rest of us. The elites at Davos, among others, are the people who really run the world. Our “representatives” in America and Europe only do their bidding.

Expect them to grasp at authoritarian straws to try and force the genie back into the bottle. It seems they are hell-bent on creating a global, authoritarian, Socialist government without telling anyone about it. They nearly succeeded by bastardizing the knowledge of the luminaries referenced above, before the Internet came along and blew a strong wind up their dirty skirts revealing all the treachery underneath.

May this entire crooked facade of scientifically-based authoritarianism based on the corruption of knowledge gleaned by great men crash and burn, and go straight to hell where it belongs.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Weekend Reading | December 16, 2016

Here are some of the most politically incorrect, incisive, interesting, or original links from around the web for the weekend of December 16, 2016.

Manosphere

---

4 Reasons Modern Beta Males Will Become Extinct

After thinking more about it, though, I then realized that the modern species of beta is closer to a walking dinosaur. The decline in Western society and the announced cultural collapse has not destroyed them all, only because the observable phenomenon is too recent and we have yet to see how brutal it will get.

How to Talk Like a Man

What does it men to talk like a man? Does it mean to say “bro” a lot as well as curse as much as possible? No, not at all. Does it mean to always use polite language and be respectful of women? Fuck no. I bring up two examples because they are ones I’ve heard before and made me write this article. In case you haven’t noticed males today aren’t the best at communicating with one another.

The Neediness Scale

Love is the alibi of neediness, and neediness is the accomplice of love. The two are rarely without each others’ company, yet they are an irascible, codependent pairing of old friends that would do one another a lot of good if they were separated and communicating via time-delayed diary entries.

Gamma is as Gamma Does

Earlier this week, I banned a monomaniac calling himself Wild Man from VP, since he was prone to intellectual dishonesty and insufficiently tall for the ride there. The wisdom of that decision was subsequently proved by his all-too-typical response of the gamma scorned, which was to a) continue trying to spread his gospel of Western egalitarianism while b) bitterly complaining about the wrongs done to him in a revisionist account of events.

News

---

Fakebook Empowers Communist Left to Bury “Fake News”

Facebook has announced it will empower Snopes, an organization with a clear left-wing bias, to bury so-called “fake news” on its news feed, a move that clearly opens the door for the outright censorship of conservative content and opinion.

House Passes Bill Allowing Government to Microchip Citizens with “Mental Disabilities”

Those in support of the legislation maintain that such programs could prevent tragedies where those with mental or cognitive disabilities wandered into dangerous circumstances. Yet, others have called these good intentions a “Trojan horse” for the expansion of a North American police state as the bill’s language could be very broadly interpreted.

Newport Introduces Marijuana Cigarettes

Newport Cigarettes, one of the world’s most popular cigarette brands, announced today that they will join the marijuana legalization trend and start producing marijuana cigarettes.

U.S. Budget Deficit to Reach $600 Billion

The White House on Friday predicted that the government’s budget deficit for the soon-to-end fiscal year will hit $600 billion, an increase of $162 billion over last year’s tally and a reversal of a steady trend of large but improving deficits on President Barack Obama’s watch.

Sheriff’s Probe Finds Obama’s Birth Certificate Fake

A years-long forensics investigation into the computer image of the long-form Hawaiian birth certificate image that Barack Obama released during a White House news conference during his first term and presented to the American people as an official government document concluded it is “fake.”

Book of the Week

---

A sweeping overview of world affairs and, especially having come across the name of William Yandell Elliott, Professor of Politics at Harvard through the first half of the 20th century.

Sean found that Elliott had created a kindergarten of Anglo-American imperialists amongst his students, who included Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Samuel P. Huntington, and McGeorge Bundy.

Upon further investigation, Sean came to understand Elliott’s own integral role, connecting the modern national-security establishment with the British Round Table Movement’s design to re-incorporate America into the British ‘empire’.

Whether that goal was achieved will be left to the reader to decide. However, it cannot be denied that W.Y. Elliott’s life and intellectual history serves to demonstrate the interlocking relationship between academia, government, and big business.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

What is Really Being Discussed by Governments at Global Warming Conferences

There is not a rainbow hovering over the global warming conferences, there is a dark cloud of tyrannical interests

Sunshine, lollipops, and rainbows, everything that’s wonderful is what I feel when we’re together. That is the image the press gives the world of the annual global warming conferences held by governments in cities around the world each year. Not only is flying to the meetings in carbon polluting jets hypocritical in the modern age of teleconferencing, which would save many millions of tons of CO2 from being emitted but the proposals being discussed at these meetings have more to do with establishing a world government than saving the world.

Lord Christopher Monckton, former Science Advisor to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, climate change skeptic, and mathematician, attended these meetings annually until he was banned for calling their statistics into question. As Monckton has revealed and this infographic shows, what is really being discussed at the annual global warming meetings is not so sunny:

The aims are largely about crippling Western economies and establishing global bureaucracy rather than saving the planet

Proposals Explained

Most of the proposals supposedly aimed at “saving the world” will only strengthen the government’s hand in our lives, and hand decision making control of sovereign nations over to a global authority.

• Right of legal personality given to Mother Earth to sue Western nations in a Climate Court. This is nothing more than a gigantic wealth redistribution scheme and a thinly veiled attempt at creating global welfare which will be funded by Western nations. It will give the right to developing countries to sue America and Europe, making each pay for its “climate sins” of the past such as using fossil fuels to move people and goods and generate electricity.
• Cut CO2 concentration to 210 ppm. This is an unachievable goal, and total insanity since today’s 400 ppm CO2 level is one of the lowest in the past 500 million years. Carbon dioxide is exhaled by humans and other animals, and acts as plant fertilizer. Without it, plants would die as they cannot photosynthesize without CO2. Plants grow faster and heartier when CO2 levels are higher.
• Create 1,000 New Bureaucracies to Manage the World Government. Thousands of bureaucracies will ultimately micromanage every facet of life of every human on the planet. Some of the colorful names of the proposed bureaucracies include: Body to Launch a Process to Further Define the Roles and Functions of the New Body to Assist the Conference of the Parties in Exercising its Functions with Respect to the Financial Mechanism. As if there wasn’t enough governmental control, the global warming polemicists now want to micromanage everything from driving to breathing with this proposal.
• American and European CO2 Emissions Cut By More than 100%. This would immediately shut down and cripple the American and European economies. Driving gasoline cars would be out of the question as would most electricity generation in the United States. The majority of electricity comes from coal. Wind farms may seem like a solution, but with only 50,000 wind turbines in the U.S. 300,000 birds are already being killed every year by the blades of these monstrosities. Estimates say as many as 5 million wind turbines would be needed to meet our current energy needs, which means tens of millions of birds would be sacrificed for green energy. Solar plants are also burning birds alive.
• Shipping and aviation fuels regulated by a world governmental body. This means business would have to submit to government authority in order to move anything from food to furniture to your Amazon purchase to flying you to your vacation destination. These fuels would be regulated, and taxed, by an unelected world government.

Creating mountains of legalistic, controlling bureaucracy and paperwork are the real aims at the global warming conferences

Carbon Taxes 15 Times More Expensive than Adaptation

Monckton has done the math of what these and other proposals, like a global carbon tax, will cost the world.

A carbon tax today would be at least 15 times more expensive and less cost-effective than adaptation to any adverse effects of global warming the day after tomorrow.

Of course, adverse affects of global warming assume the scare is right in the first place. Its effects have been underwhelming so far, which one should expect in realizing CO2 should never be classified as a pollutant as it is the basis for all life on earth. It is one of the weakest greenhouse gases, and makes up a tiny 0.039% of the atmosphere.

Taxing an element on the periodic table, the element all life on earth needs to survive is the height of government insanity. Humans are made of carbon, plants are made of carbon, and animals are made of carbon. What’s more, doomsday predictions made in the 1980s, 1990s, and early 2000s for today have not come true, even though the media have shifted into overdrive playing up normal, if tragic weather events. Indeed, fear mongering is the staple of the climate scare.

In 2006, the Stern Report on climate economics absurdly assumed a 10 percent probability that global warming would bring the world to an end by 2100. Now, after at least 16 years without warming, this assumption looks quaintly overblown. Even if we were to accept Stern’s fanatical standpoint, no proposal to mitigate global warming would be cost-effective if it were to exceed his central estimate of the undiscounted cost of doing nothing, which is just 1.5 percent of global GDP throughout this century.

In other words, it would be far cheaper to respond to the threat than it would be to cripple economies trying to prevent it based scare that is based almost exclusively on computer modeling. Monkton knows there is a human cost to this religious crusade against the life-giving molecule carbon dioxide.

This is cruelty on an unprecedented scale, in that millions are now dying of starvation – not because of global warming but because of crass and cruel policies governments are implementing for the purpose of trying to save the planet. In every way this is going to cause huge damage to [the West’s] ability to compete in the world marketplace, and for absolutely no climate benefit. People have seen right through this, and seen right through it because they know that in the end they pay for it through their taxes and through their jobs.

Beyond levying taxes on the air people breathe, killing jobs, and establishing more government control, it is often forgotten plants need carbon to photosynthesize. CO2 is plant fertilizer more than it is anything else.

Photosynthesis cannot occur without carbon (CO2) and higher levels lead to a greener planet, making it perhaps the greenest gas in the atmosphere

Control

The real reason the global warming agenda is being pushed is because it is the linchpin to the ongoing construction of the New World Order. A social hysteria has to be fomented so people act irrationally to “save the planet” when in fact all they will be doing is giving authoritarian control to an unelected body that will have the ability to tax every human being on the planet and control every aspect of people’s lives and the economy.

It is an underhanded trick, which uses elements of Judeo-Christian religion (as pointed out by bestselling author Michael Crichton) to bring about belief and submission without evidence.

It is a continuation of a century-long process of emotional manipulation by the puppetmasters in corporations and the government, which began with shifting Anglo America to a materialistic economy, then removing rational thinking from politics, and which now aims to remove all dissent from consolidation of power by an elite.

The proposals will not save the world, they will enslave it.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Mexico Finance Minister Hints at New World Order

The reason the U.S.-Mexico border has been left wide open for well over 20 years now, is because that’s part of the plan, folks. Mexico’s Finance Minister Luis Videgaray alluded to that in this article which was picked up by the Drudge Report:

Building a wall between Mexico and the United States is a terrible idea. It is an idea based on ignorance and has no foundation in the reality of North American integration.

North American integration. Now what possibly could he be talking about?

The kingdoms of the proposed New World Order

This is why Trump’s nationalism is being shouted down by the corporate-controlled media and the corporate-controlled government.

It’s a vision of the world that looks a lot like this.

Resistance to the New World Order is futile

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

The Future of the World Echoes Science Fiction

Soft tyranny has already arrived in America

The death of individuality. This is what is coming in America and eventually the world in the 21st century, already arriving in bite-size pieces.

We are already commanded from childhood as to what paths we can take in life by the government, stuck into State-run indoctrination facilities disguised as schools at the tender age of 4 or 5 and forced to remain there until age 18. If your parents do not comply, they will be arrested as this woman recently was because her honor-roll son racked up a whopping 3 unexcused absences.

Charlotte Thomson-Iserbyt was the Senior Policy Advisor in the Office of Educational Research and Improvement in the U.S. Department of Education under Ronald Reagan. Thomson-Iserbyt later turned into a whistle blower and spoke about the changes that were being develped for the public education system in the 1980s to facilitate the Department’s goal of Limited Learning for Lifelong Labor. The goal is churning out graduates who follow instructions and authority well, but who are not very good critical thinkers.

After high school we have been thoroughly brainwashed into trusting the system for the past 13 years. So, we believe college is the only way to get a comfortable middle class job. We are fed these myths by a government that benefits itself shackling young people with non-bankruptable debt. So, naturally we go and rack up an average of $30,000 in debt which makes us nice and pliable to our future employers.

We then live a life working 40-60 hours a week or more while the outlets for our Freudian id are limited to shopping, eating, watching football and bitching about politicians that we no longer control, until we retire. Heterosexuality is being criminalized (prostitution is illegal but all forms of gay sex are sacrosanct in America as just one example of this; another example are rape laws that heavily favor women which led to the Duke Lacrosse incident among others.) Our government spent all the money in the Social Security trust fund which means the program is going bankrupt. So, retirement may not be an option anymore. Working until one falls over dead may become the norm.

This pre-planned, cookie cutter life is already the status quo, the bite-size taste of what’s to come that is already being implemented. Things get worse.

Science fiction once again hints at future reality

Resistance is Futile

Once we are all RFID chipped (these chips already in our Passports, next they will be in our Drivers Licenses, and later implanted into our bodies with GPS capabilities) everything about us can be controlled electronically. The endless rules and regulations already on the books will be enforced by software that tracks our every move and by then our every word, all safeguarded by a totally digital money supply. Taxes and fines will be automatically deducted from your chip.

Once the vision of having us all chipped is realized, the future beings to look like the one presented in the 1990s television series Star Trek: The Next Generation through their arch enemies the Borg. Instead of the free (if paradoxically socialistic) society presented by the protagonists in Star Trek, the future America is pushing on its citizens and the rest of the world echoes the communist collectivism of the Borg.

The Borg hailing message represents what the corporate-government elite expect of other cultures in the world who haven’t yet swallowed the pills of materialism, feminism, and nihilism:

Existence as you know it is over. Your life as it has been is over. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. From this time forward, you will service us.  Your culture will adapt to service us. Resistance is futile.

Assimilation into the collective will be facilitated by the corporate-government complex’s economic control of the world. The very existence of a corporate-government complex means we no longer live in a free market as envisioned by our founders. Increasingly, corporations control virtually every aspect of the market and through the use of government force the individual is being turned into servants of these corporations.

What’s worse, left and right have been hopelessly vivisected against each other by these interests when they really should be natural allies, at least against misplaced power on both sides.

They accomplish their aims through the revolving door between corporate directorships and government office, corporate financing of campaigns, and corporate media running cover for what they are really doing. The revolving door is partially illustrated here.

Turning the entire world into a controlled collective, beholden to corporate bosses and government authority can now be accomplished both through electronic shackling of the masses, and because of the personality traits of the majority of the people in the world allow it.

Corporations lobby for the government to have more power, then the government enacts policies favorable to corporations

Slavery as the Natural State of Man

Going back to Greek civilization, and echoing the desires of the modern-day elite, Aristotle believed slavery was the natural state of many in our species. This sadly seems to ring true when one realizes how easily manipulated and controlled the masses are. In his book of Politics, Aristotle addresses the questions of whether slavery is contrary to nature and whether or not it is better for some people to be slaves. Aristotle claims that while there are natural slaves, it is not advantageous for someone to be held in slavery who is not a natural slave. He claims that such a condition is sustained only by force, resulting in enmity. That leaves the question…who is a natural slave and who is not?

Modern-day science seems to confirm at least some of Aristotle’s thinking. TNMM recently covered this in a post describing the traits exhibited by the majority of the population, based on the scientifically valid Myers-Briggs personality instrument. Sometimes, individuals stray from the descriptions laid out here. However, when speaking in generalities they do not. The four main personality type descriptors were touched on in our Why Politicians Lie, and Why People Believe Them article:

According to the scientifically valid Myers-Briggs personality instrument, Rationals or NTs, those who use logic and reason to make decisions, make up a tiny 10% of the population.

The largest segment of the population are SJs, who are 40-50% of the population. SJs are minions of those in power who blindly follow authority and the “official word.” SJs enforce the status quo, even if it is based on nothing but lies.

SPs are another 20-30% of the population and are primarily driven by sensation. They are flexible, aesthetically-aware, “here and now” people that, with hardly a moment’s notice, will go where their excitement leads them. These are the dupes of society.

And finally, we have the NF temperament, which I like to call the Liberal. NFs are highly idealistic people. “They are subjective, compassionate ‘feeler’ people that desire to contribute goodness and meaning to the lives of others.”

As an aside, are those who are not easily turned into slaves (especially Rationals) considered collateral damage as the collective is assembled? It is an interesting question as we steam ahead through this new electronic frontier.

Diversity™

Even though our governments claim to worship diversity and individuality, in reality they are destroying true diversity and individuality so everyone in the world can become mindless consumers. This idea is nothing new as it was developed into a screenplay 40 years ago in the 1976 drama Network. (Network is recommended viewing at TNMM.) Here is a piece from the Boardroom Scene:

You are an old man who thinks in terms of nations and peoples. There are no nations. There are no peoples. There are no Russians. There are no Arabs. There are no third worlds. There is no West. There is only one holistic system of systems, one vast and immane, interwoven, interacting, multivariate, multinational dominion of dollars. Petro-dollars, electro-dollars, multi-dollars, reichmarks, rins, rubles, pounds, and shekels.

It is the international system of currency which determines the totality of life on this planet. That is the natural order of things today. That is the atomic and subatomic and galactic structure of things today.

We no longer live in a world of nations and ideologies, Mr. Beale. The world is a college of corporations, inexorably determined by the immutable bylaws of business. The world is a business, Mr. Beale.

The merging of humans with technology is a goal of the elite

Collective Organization of Society, Its Citizens Tranqulized by VR

Instead of flying through space on a cubical ship like the Borg, when we aren’t being driven like cattle to jobs we hate and being commanded to and fro by authorities, it appears we will be mentally masturbating ourselves to an endless supply of Facebook and other virtual realities. This is alluded to in Total Recall and later The Matrix. (Although being plugged in was much less voluntary in The Matrix.)

Facebook’s Zuckerberg is already peddling this sort of virtual reality to the masses. This what he had to say about his purchase of Oculus Rift.

When you put [the Oculus Rift headset] on, you enter a completely immersive computer-generated environment, like a game or a movie scene or a place far away. The incredible thing about the technology is that you feel like you’re actually present in another place with other people. People who try it say it’s different from anything they’ve ever experienced in their lives.

What a world to live in. I reacted by buying myself time, running away from the corporate plantation American has become and hoping for the best. How will you react? Just comparing and contrasting between Anglo-America and the more traditional society I ran to seeking asylum from the arising tyranny, corporate serfdom and femi-Nazism in America, I have already been horrified at just how awry our society has run. There seems to be no stopping this freight train to hell.

The visions of what’s to come are based on logical outcomes of the systems already being put into place. It’s a countdown to see if this global dystopia envisioned in this article will be realized or if somehow this nightmare will be averted.

Instead of allowing ourselves to be divided into groups and subgroups, and subgroups of subgroups, we need to unite against the danger of losing our freedom once and for all. As Howard Beale exclaimed in Network:

I’m a human being, goddammit, my life has value!

However, I do not see these divisions being healed as long as the spinmeisters of politics and the media continue to reign supreme. Time is running out to make meaningful resistance to this dystopian view of the world…and most people just don’t seem to give a damn.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month.

Global Warming or Global Government

Is the world overheating? Or are politicans blowing hot air?

Even though the great religion of global warming has fewer adherents than at any point in its history, those who do believe are more fervent in their creed than ever. They’re also more desperate than ever to keep the polemic going and to win converts to their cause. However, their tower of lies is becoming increasingly shaky, built on the sand of hyperbole and shoddy science. Ten years ago, Al Gore claimed we had 10 years to save the planet from global warming, as pointed out in this CBS News report from early 2006.

Unless drastic measures to reduce greenhouse gases are taken within the next 10 years, the world will reach a point of no return, Gore said. He sees the situation as “a true planetary emergency.”“ If you accept the truth of that, then nothing else really matters that much,” Gore said in an interview with The Associated Press. “We have to organize quickly to come up with a coherent and really strong response, and that’s what I’m devoting myself to.”

The clock ran out late this January, and warming has not reached what Gore called planetary emergency levels. Civilization, and the world, are still here. In spite of all the self-congratulatory agreements and conferences that have been held around the world on this matter, nothing substantive has been done to “fight global warming.”

After all the rhetoric about a planet that was overheating, a number of scientists now think we could be headed into another Little Ice Age, and the global average temperature has remained steady for a decade and a half or more, defying the predictions made 20 years ago for today.

But, a lot has been done to ramp up the hysteria over normal (if devastating) weather events like tornadoes, hurricanes, floods, and fires. Now virtually every bad weather event comes tagged by the mainstream media with the suggestion that humans are to blame, even though tornadoes are down to record low numbers nationwide for 3 years in a row, and the U.S. hasn’t been hit by a major (Category 3 or higher) hurricane since Wilma in 2005, the longest stretch since the Civil War. Another of the warmists’ infamous predictions, that the Arctic would be ice-free in 2013, also came and went, and the ice cap is still stubbornly there.

If you tune in to the mainstream media you will come away with quite a different impression, however, since weather events are now hyped to the extreme because they drive ratings. Take it from me, a former apparatchik of the mainstream media who defected—causing hysteria about the weather drives ratings. Despite the hype, an increasing number of people are refusing to buy into the social hysteria surrounding global warming, which is really a thinly veiled attempt at instituting a global carbon tax.

Al Gore is probably hoping everyone forgot about yet another failed Doomsday prediction of his

Rebranding of Global Warming

Since so many of the predictions have failed, and the Earth is stubbornly refusing to go along with the global warming polemic, you might have noticed that since the global warming carbon tax scheme began in the 1980s, it has recently been rebranded. It’s now called climate change.

But wait just a minute. The climate has always been changing on earth, and it has had nothing to do with mankind. There were periods when the earth was almost completely frozen over, and other periods when tropical forests extended northward towards the poles. All of those changes occurred either before man even evolved or the invention of the “infernal” combustion engine.

Climate change is an all-encompassing term that means whether its dry or wet, hot or cold, cloudy or sunny, and snowy or rainy, the changes can then be blamed on mankind. This makes the end goal of control easier to achieve than when the farce was named global warming on a planet that refuses to heat up as much as predictions in the 1980s and 1990s for today called for.

Argumentum ad populum, which concludes a proposition is true because many or most people believe it is a logical fallacy and is to be disregarded when coming to a scientific conclusion

Consensus is Not Science, it’s Politics

The “consensus” of climate scientists who supposedly agree that CO2 is overheating the planet is often claimed to be 97%. The global warming alarm is also claimed to have the stamp of approval of the IPCC, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (the mainstream media does worship “officials” instead of logic and reason, after all). But like any governmental body, its conclusions are politically driven, and not scientifically driven.

Richard Lindzen, former Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at MIT and an atmospheric physicist, tells us the ugly truth behind this so-called consensus.

This claim that the IPCC is the world’s top 1,500 or 2,500 scientists – you look at the bibliographies of the people and it’s simply not true. There are quite a number of non-scientists. To fill the number up to 2,500 they have to start taking reviewers, and government people, and so on; anyone who ever came close to them. And none of them are asked to agree. Many of them disagree. People have decided you have to convince other people, that since no scientist disagrees, you shouldn’t disagree either. But whenever you hear that in science, that’s pure propaganda.

We will hear more from Lindzen in a moment. Professor Paul Reiter of the Pasteur Institute in Paris and a former IPCC member, has also spoken out on the “consensus.”

A galling aspect of the debate is that this spurious ‘science’ is endorsed in the public forum by influential panels of ‘experts.’ I refer particularly to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Every five years, this UN-based organization publishes a ‘consensus of the world’s top scientists’ on all aspects of climate change. Quite apart from the dubious process by which these scientists are selected, such consensus is the stuff of politics, not of science. Science proceeds by observation, hypothesis and experiment. The complexity of this process, and the uncertainties involved, are a major obstacle to a meaningful understanding of scientific issues by non-scientists. In reality, a genuine concern for mankind and the environment demands the inquiry, accuracy and skepticism that are intrinsic to authentic science. A public that is unaware of this is vulnerable to abuse.

The history of doing science by political consensus is indeed a disastrous one. Galileo was famously imprisoned until his death for challenging the establishment of his day, the Catholic Church, and teaching that the earth revolved around the sun.

More recently, Ignaz Semmelweis was thrown into an insane asylum in 1865 and then beaten to death by the guards at age 47 less than 2 weeks after being committed for suggesting doctors should wash their hands between doing autopsies and examining their patients. As a result of his “insanity” the mortality rate at clinics that adopted handwashing dropped 90% but his views conflicted with the establishment of the time. Only after his death did Louis Pasteur confirm the germ theory and vindicate Semmelweis.

Here, we have two quick examples of how dangerous establishments and political contamination of science can be. History has many others.

Carbon dioxide makes up 0.039% of the atmosphere, one of the lowest levels ever seen in the past 500 million years

CO2 is Not a Pollutant

Human-produced CO2 is claimed to be the evil behind global warming, but as we learn in elementary school science, it’s an essential gas for all life on earth. It is also one of the weakest of the greenhouse gases. It makes up a minuscule 0.04% of the atmosphere, meaning the current atmosphere is CO2-starved if one looks at the history of the planet over the last 500 million years since the Cambrian Explosion of life burst forth onto the planet. Richard Lindzen once again explains.

CO2 for different people has different attractions. After all, what is it? – it’s not a pollutant, it’s a product of every living creature’s breathing, it’s the product of all plant respiration, it is essential for plant life and photosynthesis, it’s a product of all industrial burning, it’s a product of driving – I mean, if you ever wanted a leverage point to control everything from exhalation to driving, this would be a dream. So it has a kind of fundamental attractiveness to bureaucratic mentality.

CO2 concentrations have almost always been higher than today throughout the last half a billion years, usually 5 to 25 times higher if the levels are graphed out. Plants grow better in atmospheres with higher CO2 concentrations. Quite simply, CO2 is plant food.

The planet has had even ice ages when the CO2 was much higher than today. In fact, there was an Ice Age in the end of the Ordovician when the CO2 concentration was an incredible 10-15 times higher than today. Crucially, even when there is an apparent relation between temperature and climate as in the Vostok ice core record, the relationship is the other way around from what Al Gore claims it to be. Temperature leads CO2, not the other way around. The ice core record goes back only 600,000 years, or 0.0013% of the Earth’s long history.

If one looks at temperature over the entire history of the earth (4.5 billion years) and not just the last blink of an eye in geological time (10,000 to 600,000 years ago) one does not see a causal relation between CO2 and temperature.

You may also be interested to know that in one of the last periods of low CO2 concentrations (below 300 parts per million) known as the Carboniferous, as the CO2 content tumbled, the oxygen content of the atmosphere soared to 35% and meganeura—giant insects like dragonflies that were the size of hawks and giant spiders that were the size of house plants—roamed the earth. This was due the increased oxygen available.

As you can see from these quick examples, the relationship between atmospheric gases and biology is much more complex than just “CO2 is bad.” Increased CO2 will most likely lead to a greener world, since it is plant fertilizer.

Giant insects evolved as CO2 concentration plummeted in the Carboniferous

The Real Goal: Establishing a One World Government?

It is becoming clearer with each passing year the real goal of causing hysteria over the climate is to enable a global body to tax the entire world. A body that has the ability to tax the entire world is a de-facto world government.

Lord Christopher Monckton, former science advisor to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, has been tirelessly sounding the alarm about this existential threat to freedom. He has also challenged global warming poster boy Al Gore to debate him on the science surrounding global warming, but Gore has repeatedly refused. Monckton has been criticized for being a non-climate scientist, but it is interesting that Al Gore’s non-existent credentials have never been challenged by the media. He is a mathematician, however, and is quite skilled at deconstructing the skewed statistics presented by the global warming fear-mongers.

Lord Christopher Monkton skydives into the Durban global warming conference unwelcomed

Monckton often speaks about global warming and global government but a biased media ignore him, even when they are invited to cover his events. He is very good at connecting the politics and the pseudoscience. He says global warming is being used as a fig leaf to cover the real intentions of the yearly global warming meetings of governments around the world. He attended the annual global warming meetings until he was banned for asking a valid question about why the statistics were being cherry-picked. Monckton responded by “dropping in” unwelcomed on the Durban climate conference by skydiving in from 10,000 feet when they didn’t want to let him in.

As Monckton explains, the true goals at the annual climate meetings include levying heavy global taxes that will bankrupt the financial industry, redistributing wealth from Western nations to developing countries for their so-called “climate debt,” and eventually shutting down capitalism around the world. The proposal would also give rights of legal personality to Mother Earth, enabling her to sue Western nations for their so-called “climate debt” to the third world. The aims would cripple economies and force people to figuratively go live in yurts.

The entire farrago is based on a predicted doubling of CO2 concentration by 2100 to eight one-hundreths (0.08%) of the total volume of the atmosphere, nothing significant if one looks at the history of the planet. It is also based on computer modeling which has been proven wrong time and time again because the earth is not heating up as much as predicted. It’s easy to make the connection that this has very little to do with saving the planet and everything to do with instituting a global government. Monkton eloquently explains all of these concepts in this presentation he gave in Australia.

If these birds were covered in oil this photo would be everywhere, but because wind farms killed them environmentalists look the other way

Real Environmental Problems

One of the proposed solutions to global warming has been clean energy. This is a great idea, and I’m definitely not opposed to finding better methods of producing energy.

One of the biggest pushes has been behind creating wind farms, which not only already chop hundreds of thousands of birds (some endangered) out of the sky each year, but also require huge quantities of fossil fuels to produce and maintain. One conservative estimate says it would require 5 million wind turbines to power the world, and of course the number of birds killed would rise well above the 300,000 that are killed now if there were that many blades churning in the sky. The utter hypocrisy of environmentalists who support wind farms as a clean energy solution only proves how much cognitive dissonance they have between reality and their pet projects.

The entire global warming obsession takes time, money, and resources away from other, real environmental problems.

One that is never discussed because it’s politically incorrect to do so is an economic system that encourages women to consume as many material and consumer items as they can. Economists and marketers refer to this as the she-conomy, since women make up or influence 80% or more of consumer spending. By continuing to feed the lust for material items, the economy now runs as a gigantic waste machine of consumerism, with all this waste ending up in landfills and in our oceans. It also wastes enormous amounts of fossil fuel energy producing and transporting these items around.

The statistics of pleasing the female id are not pretty. According to Becoming Minimalist (all of these claims are cited by the way:)

• The average American home now has an incredible 300,000 items in it.
• The average American home size has tripled in the last 50 years even though family size has been nearly cut in half.
• One out of every 10 homes now rent offsite storage to put junk in. A quarter of homes with two car garages don’t have room to park vehicles in them.
• The average American woman now owns 30 outfits, up from 9 a few decades ago.
• The average American now throws away 65 pounds of clothing a year.
• Women spend more on jewelry and watches than higher education.
• Women spend a full eight years of their lives shopping.
• Americans spend $1.2 trillion annually on non-essential goods—things they do not need, in other words. Again, 80% of this spending is driven by women.

After seeing these statistics, perhaps a better environmental solution is promoting a minimalistic lifestyle that isn’t driven by materialism and consumerism, one that moves away from a she-conomy. Just look at the abominable amount of waste it is creating.

If the world moved away from a female-driven consumer economy to something—to use one of the environmentalists’ favorite terms—a little more sustainable, wouldn’t we all be better off? It certainly makes more sense than waging a war on a trace gas that is essential for all life on earth, one of the weakest greenhouse gases that stands at one of the lowest levels it has ever been over the last 500 million years.

Help us grow by making a purchase from our Recommended Reading and Viewing page or our Politically Incorrect Apparel and Merchandise page or buy anything from Amazon using this link. You can also Sponsor The New Modern Man for as little as $1 a month. This The New Modern Man article originally appeared on Return of Kings.